[EDIT] Just for information, what you called " tracing " (step 3.1.2) take me ... 2 minutes of work. There is more than 25 hours of painting after, without "use" the photoreference, as explained in... the tutorial... just read[/EDIT]
You're a genius. I always have difficulties deciding what to draw. Like you, I've kept some photos in a folder that inspire me. But don't exactly inspire at the same time because i don't know what to draw from it. This is such a great idea! I love it! You're tutorials are amazing! Thank you so much for sharing your ideas and techniques! Im loving it! Keep working hard
People need to get off their high horses. There are many well known artists and illustrators that use/have used the tracing techniques or other 'short ways' and different types of help to make their art, that's nothing new. Probably many that won't even admit it. Before photography many of the old masters used a camera obscura of some sort [link] That doesn't mean their art isn't their own or not great. AquaSixio's art is certainly his own, it's creative and far from the original photo. So thanks for the tutorial AquaSixio, keep it up, and never mind the ignorant!
There's absolutely nothing wrong with the "tracing" in this tutorial. He wanted to communicate an idea, a feeling; so he used all methods available to achieve this goal. I can't stand seeing perfect copies of a photo of some famous chap getting a lot of praise when they mean nothing and are but a demonstration of technique, and this getting bummed down when it's wonderful ART. Lots of the Great Masters of the renaissance used similar techniques (heck, even Canaletto traced his landscapes with the aid of the camera obscura).
Come on guys, art is not about knowing how to draw a the figure is about telling a story, inspiring people and above all... imagination. Not to mention he changed all about the reference picture. Just ridiculous.
I'm not saying that this is stealing but until you have understood foundational skills(which can't be learned from simply tracing) that you should refrain from this because it will deter the development of your artistic skills because you will become so reliant on tracing. Which in turn, will become a crutch.
These tutorials are fantastic! Thanks so much for taking the time to explain everything so well. This one in particular really speaks to me. I often see a photo that inspires me but I don't know how to go about making what I see in my head appear on paper. (or digital canvas) Seeing how you deal with it makes a lot of sense to me and I am looking forward to trying a new painting again. I also really enjoy the turtle color tutorial! <3
Please. There is a large difference between tracing for reference and stealing a person's artwork.
If you look at the "tracing in question" in Aquasixio's tutorial, you will notice that they covered a general and basic outline of the photo, NOT a line-for-line copy of it. The child is a girl, looking down and wearing a completely different hat than Aquasixio's interpretation of it. (Boy, different hat, head tilted upwards vs. downwards, eyes visible vs. looking down) There is nothing wrong with Aquasixio's method; in fact, they have perfectly demonstrated an appropriate , albeit different, approach to using reference photos as a BASE for an art piece. Many great artists do this. This method is COMPLETELY different from someone's example of student's copying a photo line-for-line off a projector. People need to use their heads.
There are many well known artists and illustrators that use/have used the tracing techniques or other 'short ways' and different types of help to make their art, that's nothing new. Probably many that won't even admit it. Before photography many of the old masters used a camera obscura of some sort [link] That doesn't mean their art isn't their own or not great.
AquaSixio's art is certainly his own, it's creative and far from the original photo. So thanks for the tutorial AquaSixio, keep it up, and never mind the ignorant!
You're right though, ppl should read the book covering Norman Rockwell's technique.
Come on guys, art is not about knowing how to draw a the figure is about telling a story, inspiring people and above all... imagination. Not to mention he changed all about the reference picture. Just ridiculous.
I also really enjoy the turtle color tutorial! <3
There is a large difference between tracing for reference and stealing a person's artwork.
If you look at the "tracing in question" in Aquasixio's tutorial, you will notice that they covered a general and basic outline of the photo, NOT a line-for-line copy of it. The child is a girl, looking down and wearing a completely different hat than Aquasixio's interpretation of it. (Boy, different hat, head tilted upwards vs. downwards, eyes visible vs. looking down) There is nothing wrong with Aquasixio's method; in fact, they have perfectly demonstrated an appropriate , albeit different, approach to using reference photos as a BASE for an art piece. Many great artists do this. This method is COMPLETELY different from someone's example of student's copying a photo line-for-line off a projector.
People need to use their heads.